INNOVATIONS in pharmacy

Evaluating the Efficacy of 3 Recruitment Methods for Enrolling Patients in Chronic Care Management Services: A Pilot Study

Anastasia B. Jenkins

Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Mississippi

Elizabeth Holley

North Mississippi Medical Center

Cory Rogers

University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy

Natalie Montgomery

Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Mississippi

Adam N. Pate

Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Mississippi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i4.5086

Keywords: chronic care management, billable pharmacy services, telephone, enrollment, disease management

---

Abstract

Chronic Care Management (CCM) is a billable service that pharmacists can provide either in person or via telephone in ambulatory clinics or community pharmacies. Pharmacists may use this service to expand current roles in patient care and add billable services to an ambulatory care practice.  The number of clinics employing CCM is steadily increasing, and to date, there has been limited information published to aid pharmacists who are considering implementing these services.  The purpose of this study is to compare enrollment success in a clinic-based, pharmacist-led CCM service using three recruitment strategies to enroll patients: in person, telephone, and provider referred recruitment.  This pilot study examined the success of three recruitment strategies using 94 patients eligible for CCM services in a rural health clinic. The primary outcome was successful enrollment in the CCM program with differences in recruitment strategy enrollment success examined using a Chi-square test. Overall, 42 of 94 patients (45%) were successfully enrolled in the CCM program with no statistical difference appreciated between telephone, in person, and provider referred recruitment. Nearly 33% (14/42) of patients enrolled in person, 40% (17/42) enrolled via telephone, and 26% (11/42) enrolled when referred from a provider.  Ten patients (11%) declined enrollment outright. The remaining 42 patients were hesitant to enroll and requested follow up.  In conclusion, there was no statistical difference in CCM enrollment success with in person, telephone, or provider referred recruitment, although more patients were enrolled via telephone than with the other two strategies.  Pharmacists implementing new CCM programs may tailor their recruitment and enrollment strategy to suit their specific needs.